Miżien: claims by European Parliament Committee on Petitions (commissioned study)Updates to the checks of claims by European Parliament Committee on Petitions (commissioned study): new claims, verdicts, report versions and replies. A record, not a score.https://leandergrech.github.io/Mizien/bodies/ep-peti-study/2026-10-14T12:00:00ZMiżientag:leandergrech.github.io,2026:mizien:CC-120:2026-10-14:check-started:check-started-by-worker-c-primary-wording-study-key-findings-pe-783-089-re-read-from-the-europarl-pdf-the-study-takes-its-malta-figures-from-the-eea-report-environmental-noise-in-europe-2025CC-120 EP study: 54,000 exposed to road noise, likely an underestimate: Check started (Check started by worker C. Primary wording (study key findings, PE 783.089) re-read from the europarl PDF; the study takes its Malta figures from the EEA report Environmental noise in Europe 2025.)2026-10-14T12:00:00ZCheck started: Check started by worker C. Primary wording (study key findings, PE 783.089) re-read from the europarl PDF; the study takes its Malta figures from the EEA report Environmental noise in Europe 2025.. CC-120, Noise; verdict so far: Largely supported (draft, no right of reply needed).tag:leandergrech.github.io,2026:mizien:CC-120:2026-10-14:exact-wording-found:verbatim-found-in-the-study-key-findings-p-14-s-2-3-pp-16-18-eea-report-read-in-full-text-tables-2-1-3-7-3-12-ss-1-4-1-5-eurostat-demo-pjan-retrieved-the-eea-page-notes-a-corrigendum-to-health-estimates-incorporated-27-mar-2026CC-120 EP study: 54,000 exposed to road noise, likely an underestimate: Exact wording found (Verbatim found in the study (key findings p. 14; s. 2.3 pp. 16-18). EEA report read in full text (Tables 2.1, 3.7, 3.12; ss. 1.4-1.5); Eurostat demo_pjan retrieved. The EEA page notes a corrigendum to health estimates, incorporated 27 Mar 2026.)2026-10-14T12:00:00ZExact wording found: Verbatim found in the study (key findings p. 14; s. 2.3 pp. 16-18). EEA report read in full text (Tables 2.1, 3.7, 3.12; ss. 1.4-1.5); Eurostat demo_pjan retrieved. The EEA page notes a corrigendum to health estimates, incorporated 27 Mar 2026.. CC-120, Noise; verdict so far: Largely supported (draft, no right of reply needed).tag:leandergrech.github.io,2026:mizien:CC-120:2026-10-14:version-1-0-first-issue:first-issue-largely-supported-moderate-no-right-of-reply-neededCC-120 EP study: 54,000 exposed to road noise, likely an underestimate: Version 1.0: first issue (First issue. Largely supported (moderate). No right of reply needed.)2026-10-14T12:00:00ZVersion 1.0: first issue: First issue. Largely supported (moderate). No right of reply needed.. CC-120, Noise; verdict so far: Largely supported (draft, no right of reply needed).tag:leandergrech.github.io,2026:mizien:CC-120:2026-10-14:evidence-reviewedCC-120 EP study: 54,000 exposed to road noise, likely an underestimate: Evidence reviewed2026-10-14T12:00:00ZEvidence reviewed. CC-120, Noise; verdict so far: Largely supported (draft, no right of reply needed).tag:leandergrech.github.io,2026:mizien:CC-120:2026-10-11:added-to-the-claims-to-checkCC-120 EP study: 54,000 exposed to road noise, likely an underestimate: Added to the claims to check2026-10-11T12:00:00ZAdded to the claims to check. CC-120, Noise; verdict so far: Largely supported (draft, no right of reply needed).tag:leandergrech.github.io,2026:mizien:CC-020:2026-10-06:note:traced-the-21-vs-9-figure-the-era-consultation-annex-wayback-copy-pp-5-6-carries-it-in-the-office-of-the-superintendent-of-public-healths-comment-and-names-no-survey-the-marmara-october-2019-summary-has-no-such-figure-noise-worry-score-3-90-of-5-only-origin-unidentified-search-log-in-literature-cc-020-notes-mdCC-020 EP study: noise law not the cause: Note (Traced the 21% vs 9% figure: the ERA consultation annex (Wayback copy, pp. 5-6) carries it in the Office of the Superintendent of Public Health's comment and names no survey; the Marmarà October 2019 summary has no such figure (noise worry score 3.90 of 5 only). Origin unidentified. Search log in literature/CC-020/notes.md.)2026-10-06T12:00:00ZNote: Traced the 21% vs 9% figure: the ERA consultation annex (Wayback copy, pp. 5-6) carries it in the Office of the Superintendent of Public Health's comment and names no survey; the Marmarà October 2019 summary has no such figure (noise worry score 3.90 of 5 only). Origin unidentified. Search log in literature/CC-020/notes.md.. CC-020, Noise; verdict so far: Largely supported (draft, no right of reply needed).tag:leandergrech.github.io,2026:mizien:CC-020:2026-10-06:version-1-1:1-1-corrections-after-the-6-oct-2026-audit-sub-claim-c-evidence-21-vs-9-tracing-eea-attribution-right-of-reply-wording-layout-tagCC-020 EP study: noise law not the cause: Version 1.1 (1.1: corrections after the 6 Oct 2026 audit: sub-claim C evidence, 21% vs 9% tracing, EEA attribution, right-of-reply wording, layout, tag.)2026-10-06T12:00:00ZVersion 1.1: 1.1: corrections after the 6 Oct 2026 audit: sub-claim C evidence, 21% vs 9% tracing, EEA attribution, right-of-reply wording, layout, tag.. CC-020, Noise; verdict so far: Largely supported (draft, no right of reply needed).tag:leandergrech.github.io,2026:mizien:CC-020:2026-10-06:evidence-reviewedCC-020 EP study: noise law not the cause: Evidence reviewed2026-10-06T12:00:00ZEvidence reviewed. CC-020, Noise; verdict so far: Largely supported (draft, no right of reply needed).tag:leandergrech.github.io,2026:mizien:CC-020:2026-10-06:correction:sub-claim-c-now-rated-on-the-studys-own-analysis-of-consultation-responses-and-the-petition-supported-study-removed-the-statement-that-eurostats-indicator-captures-exactly-what-the-directive-does-not-it-includes-road-traffic-which-the-directive-covers-the-21-vs-9-figure-is-no-longer-described-as-untraceable-or-unopened-annex-read-origin-unidentified-the-eea-underestimate-is-attributed-to-the-eea-the-study-citing-eea-tag-compliance-not-health-added-verdict-and-confidence-unchangedCC-020 EP study: noise law not the cause: Correction (Sub-claim C now rated on the study's own analysis of consultation responses and the petition (Supported (study)); removed the statement that Eurostat's indicator captures exactly what the Directive does not (it includes road traffic, which the Directive covers). The 21% vs 9% figure is no longer described as untraceable or unopened: annex read, origin unidentified. The EEA underestimate is attributed to the EEA (the study, citing EEA). Tag Compliance-not-health added. Verdict and confidence unchanged.)2026-10-06T12:00:00ZCorrection: Sub-claim C now rated on the study's own analysis of consultation responses and the petition (Supported (study)); removed the statement that Eurostat's indicator captures exactly what the Directive does not (it includes road traffic, which the Directive covers). The 21% vs 9% figure is no longer described as untraceable or unopened: annex read, origin unidentified. The EEA underestimate is attributed to the EEA (the study, citing EEA). Tag Compliance-not-health added. Verdict and confidence unchanged.. CC-020, Noise; verdict so far: Largely supported (draft, no right of reply needed).tag:leandergrech.github.io,2026:mizien:CC-020:2026-10-06:clarification:right-of-reply-wording-the-2026-10-05-version-1-0-entrys-not-yet-sent-is-superseded-no-right-of-reply-is-needed-for-a-largely-supported-verdict-cover-footers-flyer-revision-log-and-caveats-now-say-no-right-of-reply-needed-layout-fix-the-data-table-on-pages-5-6-no-longer-splits-flyer-verdict-note-reworded-infringement-quote-location-corrected-to-chapter-4-in-the-literature-recordCC-020 EP study: noise law not the cause: Clarification (Right-of-reply wording: the 2026-10-05 version 1.0 entry's 'not yet sent' is superseded; no right of reply is needed for a Largely supported verdict. Cover, footers, flyer, revision log and caveats now say 'no right of reply needed'. Layout fix: the data table on pages 5-6 no longer splits. Flyer verdict note reworded; infringement quote location corrected to chapter 4 in the literature record.)2026-10-06T12:00:00ZClarification: Right-of-reply wording: the 2026-10-05 version 1.0 entry's 'not yet sent' is superseded; no right of reply is needed for a Largely supported verdict. Cover, footers, flyer, revision log and caveats now say 'no right of reply needed'. Layout fix: the data table on pages 5-6 no longer splits. Flyer verdict note reworded; infringement quote location corrected to chapter 4 in the literature record.. CC-020, Noise; verdict so far: Largely supported (draft, no right of reply needed).tag:leandergrech.github.io,2026:mizien:CC-020:2026-10-05:version-1-0-first-issue:first-issue-right-of-reply-not-yet-sentCC-020 EP study: noise law not the cause: Version 1.0: first issue (First issue. Right of reply not yet sent.)2026-10-05T12:00:00ZVersion 1.0: first issue: First issue. Right of reply not yet sent.. CC-020, Noise; verdict so far: Largely supported (draft, no right of reply needed).tag:leandergrech.github.io,2026:mizien:CC-020:2026-10-05:clarification:right-of-reply-status-brought-into-line-with-the-5-oct-2026-rule-a-reply-is-sought-only-where-a-check-finds-a-claim-not-substantiated-misleading-or-contradicted-so-this-check-needs-none-cover-page-footer-flyer-and-the-standards-appendix-now-say-so-findings-verdict-and-confidence-unchangedCC-020 EP study: noise law not the cause: Clarification (Right-of-reply status brought into line with the 5 Oct 2026 rule: a reply is sought only where a check finds a claim Not substantiated, Misleading or Contradicted, so this check needs none. Cover, page footer, flyer and the standards appendix now say so. Findings, verdict and confidence unchanged.)2026-10-05T12:00:00ZClarification: Right-of-reply status brought into line with the 5 Oct 2026 rule: a reply is sought only where a check finds a claim Not substantiated, Misleading or Contradicted, so this check needs none. Cover, page footer, flyer and the standards appendix now say so. Findings, verdict and confidence unchanged.. CC-020, Noise; verdict so far: Largely supported (draft, no right of reply needed).tag:leandergrech.github.io,2026:mizien:CC-020:2026-10-03:added-to-the-claims-to-checkCC-020 EP study: noise law not the cause: Added to the claims to check2026-10-03T12:00:00ZAdded to the claims to check. CC-020, Noise; verdict so far: Largely supported (draft, no right of reply needed).